Legal Opinion

Cross v. Beguelin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This is a submitted controversy upon an agreed statement of facts. The question submitted for decision is the effect of section 664 of the Penal Law upon the rights of others than those for whose protection it was enacted. More specifically, whether a vendor from whom a corporation has purchased its own corporate stock may enforce the contract as to installments of the purchase price remaining unpaid when there is no corporate surplus, but also when there are no general creditors or unpaid claims except claims for salary of officers and directors who represented the corporation in the making…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Fechheimer Fisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. Garrison v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nakano v. Nakano McGlone Nightingale Advertising, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Melniker v. American Title & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Harker v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
  4. Laue v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. New York Credit Men's Ass'n v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API